DocketNumber: 6 Div. 154.
Judges: Gardner, Anderson, Sayre, Brown, Miller
Filed Date: 1/13/1921
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/2/2024
In the case of Board of Revenue v. City of Birmingham,
The opinion in that case deals with the act of 1887 and other acts relied upon by the board of revenue as justifying the amended levy made in the instant case, and the holding there is decisive of this appeal. The result of the holding in that case is that as to one-half of said tax, so collected, the board of revenue was without discretion, control, or right of disposal thereof, but could only pay it over to the municipality as prescribed by law.
It therefore follows that under this construction of these acts the board of revenue was without authority to so amend the tax levy as to deprive the city of Birmingham of its portion of said special tax, and that the order of June 18th, which would have this effect, was unauthorized, and should be annulled.
We think therefore mandamus is the proper remedy, and that the trial court correctly ruled. The judgment is accordingly affirmed.
Affirmed.
ANDERSON, C. J., and SAYRE and BROWN, JJ., concur.
ANDERSON, C. J., and SAYRE and MILLER, JJ., concur.