DocketNumber: 6 Div. 550.
Citation Numbers: 194 So. 538, 239 Ala. 9, 1940 Ala. LEXIS 76
Judges: Gardner, Anderson, Bouldin, Foster
Filed Date: 1/11/1940
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/2/2024
Upon the question of substantive law, this cause is ruled by Eugene H. Hawkins v. City of Birmingham, post, p. 185,
Upon the matter of remedy, the holding was that prohibition would lie.
As a consequence, the learned trial judge correctly ruled the present bill was without equity, and his decree will accordingly be here affirmed.
Affirmed.
ANDERSON, C. J., and BOULDIN and FOSTER, JJ., concur.