Citation Numbers: 185 Ala. 201, 64 So. 90
Judges: Anderson, Dowdell, Graffenried, Mayfield
Filed Date: 11/20/1913
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 7/27/2022
UPON REHEARING.
Counsel, upon application for rehearing, contend that the principle laid down in the foregoing opinion is opposed by the case of Bibb v. Hitchcock, 49 Ala. 468, 20 Am. Rep. 288. This may be true, but said case was expressly repudiated, on this point, in United Fidelity Co. v. Charles, 131 Ala. 658, 31 South. 558, 57 L. R. A. 212, and Folmar v. Siler, 132 Ala. 297, 31 South. 719.
The application is overruled.