DocketNumber: 7 Div. 632.
Citation Numbers: 109 So. 154, 215 Ala. 18, 1926 Ala. LEXIS 287
Judges: Anderson, Gardner, Miller, Sayre
Filed Date: 6/17/1926
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024
This case has been before this court before (
The bill avers an offer on complainant's part and a refusal by the respondent to prosecute a suit in the name of the respondent to quiet or perfect the title. This he no doubt had the right to do upon indemnifying the respondent as to cost, the respondent and not the complainant being in the possession of the land, but this offer should have been prompt and seasonable and not after the expiration of 10 years from the sale of the land and after the respondent established a title by adverse possession. From aught appearing, the complainant was guilty of laches in offering to prosecute the suit for the respondent. Moreover, the bill does not aver an offer to indemnify the respondent against cost, though this particular point was not taken by demurrer, but the grounds that were interposed were well taken, and the decree of the circuit court, in sustaining said demurrer, is affirmed.
Affirmed.
SAYRE, GARDNER, and MILLER, JJ., concur. *Page 19