State ex rel. Watkins v. Sellers

CRAWLEY, Judge,

concurring in the judgment.

I concur in the judgment of reversal. However, I believe that the State was entitled to a judgment of forfeiture of the automobile because Gibbs failed to prove that she was a lienholder; she presented no evidence that she held a lien or a security interest in the vehicle. See Jester v. State, 668 So.2d 822 (Ala.Civ.App.1995). Therefore, I would remand the cause for the entry of a judgment of forfeiture.