Hill v. State

ON REMAND FROM THE ALABAMA SUPREME COURT

PATTERSON, Judge.

Pursuant to the decision of the Alabama Supreme Court in Ex parte Hill, 557 So.2d 838 (Ala.1989), holding that Hill’s inculpato-ry statement was not voluntary and that its admission into evidence at trial deprived him of a fair trial, the judgment of the circuit court is reversed, and this case is remanded for further proceedings.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

All Judges concur.