DocketNumber: 8 Div. 794.
Judges: Samford
Filed Date: 2/15/1921
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/2/2024
The rulings of the court on the pleadings were without error. Jones v. State,
We have carefully read and considered the evidence in this case in support of defendant's motion for a new trial, and, while there are strong grounds for suspicion, we do not think, when applied to the true rules of law, the evidence is sufficient to sustain a conviction. The court should have granted the motion to set aside the verdict.
For this error the judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded.
Reversed the remanded.