DocketNumber: 4 Div. 913.
Judges: Foster
Filed Date: 10/28/1924
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/2/2024
The defendant was indicted for, and convicted of, wanton injury to animals, the particular offense being that he shot a mule belonging to one Vinson. - He justified under the statute upon the theory that the mule had broken into and was trespassing upon growing crops.
The evidence showed that the trespass was upon a Bermuda grass pasture, inclosed and used as such; that it had been sodded and was- cared for. and maintained as a pasture. The court instructed the jury that such a pasture as described in the evidence could not be held to be growing crops within the purview of the statute of mitigation ■ or justification, and this constitutes the only question presented for decision. We find no error in this ruling.
Statutes are construed with reference to the common meaning and acceptation of their terms, unless it appears, from the context that a different or technical meaning is to be given the terms employed.
“Crop, as defined by Webster, is: ‘That which is gathered; the corn or fruits of the earth collected; harvest; the word which includes every species of fruit or product gathered for man or beast; corn or other cultivated plants, while growing (a popular use of the word); anything cut off or gathered.’ The etymology of the word crop appears to be from, the Saxon crop, or cropp, signifying the crop of a fowl, a cluster of ears of corn, grapes, ears of corn, and from the Welsh cropiad, a gathering or taking hold of. Webst. verb. Crops. The definition given by Webster is even broader than the popular signification of the word. Under the former, as we see, not only is meant grain produced from annual vegetation, but also fruits from'
As used in the statute, the term “growing crops,” means those things usually and commonly planted, cultivated and harvested for the use or profit of the husbandman, and does not include Bermuda grass in a pasture. 12 Cyc. 975; 7 Corpus Juris 379, notes b, c, and d.
Charge No. 1 requested by the defendant was properly refused. 1 Maliqe was not a necessary ingredient of the offense. It was sufficient if the shooting was unlawfully done. Code 1907, § 6230.
Charge No. 2, the general charge for the defendant, was properly refused as there was ample evidence to justify a conviction.
The judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.