DocketNumber: 5358
Judges: Witz, Rabinowitz, Con-Nor, Burke, Matthews, Compton
Filed Date: 1/29/1982
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/13/2024
with whom CONNOR, Justice, joins, dissenting.
I dissent.
The majority concedes that, viewed in context, the trial court was concerned with the respective stability of the parties, not their sexual conduct. I agree with that conclusion and see no reason to reverse the court’s custody determination simply because of Judge Stewart’s reference to what the majority deems an “impermissible factor.” I would affirm the judgment of the superior court.