Murry v. Hobbs

Cite as 2014 Ark. 98
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS
No. CV-13-921
Opinion Delivered February 27, 2014
PRO SE APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT
ERIC LAVELL MURRY COURT OF JEFFERSON COUNTY
APPELLANT AND APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR
DEFAULT JUDGMENT [No. 35CV-13-
v. 100]
RAY HOBBS, DIRECTOR, ARKANSAS HONORABLE JODI RAINES DENNIS,
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION JUDGE
APPELLEE
AFFIRMED; MOTION DENIED.
PER CURIAM
In 2005, appellant Eric Lavell Murry entered a plea of guilty to charges of theft by
receiving, being a felon in possession of a firearm, and possession of a controlled substance with
intent to deliver, for which he received a ten-year suspended sentence on each count and was
ordered to pay $500 in court costs. A petition for revocation of suspended sentence was filed
in 2009, alleging that appellant had failed to meet the conditions under which the sentence was
suspended. Following a revocation hearing, the trial court revoked appellant’s suspended
imposition of sentence and sentenced him to 360 months’ incarceration in the Arkansas
Department of Correction. The Arkansas Court of Appeals affirmed. Murry v. State, 2010 Ark.
App. 782.
In 2013, appellant, who was incarcerated at a unit of the Arkansas Department of
Correction located in Jefferson County, filed a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus in the
Cite as 2014 Ark. 98
Jefferson County Circuit Court.1 In the petition for writ of habeas corpus, appellant, who was
represented by counsel when the plea was entered, alleged that the writ should issue on the
grounds that he was not afforded effective assistance of counsel when he entered the plea of
guilty in 2005 and that the 2005 ten-year suspended imposition of sentence was an illegal
sentence. The circuit court denied the petition, and appellant brings this appeal. He has also
filed a motion for a “default judgment,” arguing that he is entitled to have the order reversed
because the State did not file its brief in the appeal within thirty days of the date that the
appellant’s brief was filed.
First, there is no merit to the motion for default judgment. The State timely filed its brief
on appeal; moreover, there is no provision in the prevailing rules of procedure requiring an order
to be reversed based on when the appellee filed its brief.
With respect to the merits of the appeal, the order is affirmed. A writ of habeas corpus
is proper only when a judgment of conviction is invalid on its face or when a trial court lacked
jurisdiction over the cause. Glaze v. Hobbs, 2013 Ark. 458; Abernathy v. Norris, 2011 Ark. 335 (per
curiam); Davis v. Reed, 316 Ark. 575, 873 S.W.2d 524 (1994). The burden is on the petitioner in
a habeas-corpus petition to establish that the trial court lacked jurisdiction or that the
commitment was invalid on its face; otherwise, there is no basis for a finding that a writ of
habeas corpus should issue. Young v. Norris, 365 Ark. 219, 226 S.W.3d 797 (2006) (per curiam).
The petitioner must plead either the facial invalidity of the judgment or the lack of jurisdiction
and make a “showing by affidavit or other evidence [of] probable cause to believe” that he is
1
As of the date of this opinion, appellant remains incarcerated in Jefferson County.
2
Cite as 2014 Ark. 98
illegally detained. Id. at 221, 226 S.W.3d at 798.
On appeal, appellant raises the same claims as those raised in the habeas petition. We
will not reverse a circuit court’s decision granting or denying a petition for writ of habeas corpus
unless the decision was clearly erroneous. Hill v. State, 2013 Ark. 413 (per curiam) (citing Pankau
v. State, 2013 Ark. 162). A finding is clearly erroneous when, although there is evidence to
support it, the appellate court, after reviewing the entire evidence, is left with the definite and
firm conviction that a mistake has been committed. Id.
Appellant here failed to demonstrate probable cause for the issuance of the writ. As to
the claims of ineffective assistance of counsel, the allegations are not cognizable in a habeas
proceeding. Rodgers v. State, 2011 Ark. 443 (per curiam); Willis v. State, 2011 Ark. 312 (per
curiam); Tryon v. State, 2011 Ark. 76 (per curiam); Grimes v. State, 2010 Ark. 97 (per curiam).
Assertions concerning counsel’s effectiveness are properly raised pursuant to Arkansas Rule of
Criminal Procedure 37.1 (2013). Rodgers, 2011 Ark. 443; Christopher v. Hobbs, 2011 Ark. 399 (per
curiam); Moore v. Hobbs, 2010 Ark. 380 (per curiam); Hill v. Norris, 2010 Ark. 287 (per curiam).
A petition for writ of habeas corpus is not a substitute for proceeding under the Rule. Rodgers,
2011 Ark. 443; Tryon, 2011 Ark. 76; see also Johnson v. Hobbs, 2010 Ark. 459 (per curiam);
Rickenbacker v. Norris, 361 Ark. 291, 206 S.W.3d 220 (2005).
Appellant based the claim that the sentence in his case was illegal on the argument that
the 360-month sentence imposed on him in 2009 was improper because the court in 2005 did
not have authority to suspend imposition of sentence for a Class Y felony drug offense.
However, with regard to the disposition of probation for drug offenses, this court has held that
3
Cite as 2014 Ark. 98
Act 192 of 1993 amended Arkansas Code Annotated sections 5-4-104(e)(1) and 5-4-301(a)(1)
(Supp. 1991) to permit suspension and probation as alternative sentences for certain drug
offenses. Crouse v. State, 2012 Ark. 442; see also Elders v. State, 321 Ark. 60, 900 S.W.2d 170
(1995). The argument pertaining to the 2005 suspended sentence did not establish a
jurisdictional defect or that the judgment-and-commitment order was invalid on its face. See
Loftis v. Hobbs, 2013 Ark. 352 (per curiam).
Because appellant’s petition did not establish the facial invalidity of the judgment or
demonstrate a lack of the trial court’s jurisdiction, appellant did not establish a basis for a writ
of habeas corpus to issue. See Culbertson v. State, 2012 Ark. 112 (per curiam); see also Skinner v.
Hobbs, 2011 Ark. 383 (per curiam); McHaney v. Hobbs, 2012 Ark. 361 (per curiam). Accordingly,
the circuit court’s order is affirmed.
Affirmed; motion denied.
Eric Lavell Murry, pro se appellant.
Dustin McDaniel, Att’y Gen., by: Ashley Argo Priest, Ass’t Att’y Gen., for appellee.
4