Judges: DUSTIN McDANIEL Attorney General
Filed Date: 9/10/2007
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 7/5/2016
The Honorable Jimmy Jeffress State Senator Post Office Box 904 Crossett, AR 71635-0904
Dear Senator Jeffress:
I am writing in response to your request for an opinion concerning a bequest to two Arkansas public school districts. Specifically, you state the following facts and pose the following questions:
The Crossett and Hamburg School Districts are named in the will of a Colorado resident named A. B. Chapman. Mr. Chapman left to be divided between the two districts an estate of approximately $1.2 million consisting of cash and investments in stocks and bonds. Mr. Chapman's will states that the funds are given to the districts as an endowed fund for scholarships for students of the two districts. Both districts request an Attorney General's Opinion on the following questions as to the handling of these funds:
Can the funds be initially received in the form of cash and stocks and bonds and initially held as such by a financial institution licensed to do so?
Are these funds considered public funds under Arkansas Code or may they be treated as an endowment fund and invested outside the restraints placed on public funds?
Can the stocks and bonds received remain as such or must they be converted to cash and invested as public funds?
Must the districts invest the cash portion of the bequeath as public funds or do the districts have other investment options?
~ RESPONSE
Although I have not seen the applicable gift instrument, it appears that this bequest to the school districts may be held as an "endowment fund" under the Uniform Management of Institutional Funds Act (UMIFA), codified at A.C.A. §§
An "endowment fund" under UMIFA is "an institutional fund, or any part thereof, not wholly expendable by the institution on a current basis under the terms of the applicable gift instrument." Id. at-602(3). For a full understanding of what constitutes an "endowment fund" under this uniform act,1 it is necessary to review several other definitions. First, a "gift instrument" means:
a will, deed, grant, conveyance, agreement, memorandum, writing, or other governing document (including the terms of any institutional solicitations from which an institutional fund resulted) under which property is transferred to or held by an institution as an institutional fund.
A.C.A. § 28-69-602(5).
An "institutional fund" is:
a fund held by an institution for its exclusive use, benefit, or purposes, but does not include (i) a fund held for an institution by a trustee that is not an institution or (ii) a fund in which a beneficiary that is not an institution has an interest, other than possible rights that could arise upon violation or failure of the purposes of the fund[.]
Id. at (2).
The term "institution" is defined in turn as:
. . . an incorporated or unincorporated organization organized and operated exclusively for educational, religious, charitable, or other eleemosynary purposes, or a governmental organization, including, without limitation, a public institution of higher education, to the extent that it holds funds exclusively for any of these purposes[.]
Id. at (1) (emphasis added).
The Commentaries to these definitions observe that UMIFA "applies to a governmental organization to the extent that the organization holds funds for the listed purposes, e.g., a public school which has an endowment fund." Commentaries to Arkansas Code Titles 5-28, Vol. B (Repl. 1995) at 532. It is thus clear that a school district can be an "institution" that holds an "institutional fund," and more specifically an "endowment fund," under UMIFA. Again, to reiterate, an "endowment fund" is an "institutional fund" that is "not wholly expendable by the institution on a current basis. . . ." The bequest under Mr. Chapman's will appears to meet the latter part of the definition, in that it is to be held for scholarships. To qualify as an "institutional fund," the fund must be held by the institution "for its exclusive use, benefit, or purposes." A.C.A. § 28-69-602(2), supra. In this regard, the Commentaries explain that the placing of a restriction on the use of a gift or bequest to an institution does not mean that the gift or bequest is not for the "exclusive use, benefit or purposes" of the institution, provided the appointed use is one that is within the institution's lawful purposes. The Commentaries state that "[t]he ``use, benefit or purposes' of an institution broadly encompasses all of the activities permitted by its charter or other source of authority." Commentaries, supra, at 532. Accord Yale University v. Blumenthal,
Based on the foregoing, therefore, it seems likely that the property transferred to the school districts under Mr. Chapman's will is held by the districts as an "endowment fund" under UMIFA. The districts should consult local counsel for a definitive determination regarding UMIFA. Assuming the applicability of this act, however, your questions can be answered by noting that subject to any specific limitations in the gift instrument, the body responsible for managing such an "endowment fund" — each school district's board of directors in this instance — has broad powers of investment with respect to the fund, to be exercised with "ordinary care and prudence. . . ." Id. at-605 and 607. See also Commentaries to Arkansas Code Titles 5-28, Vol. B (Repl. 1995) at 534. More specific to your particular questions, the districts in my opinion are not required to invest such a fund as "public funds" under the Code, and there is no requirement that the stocks and bonds be converted to cash. These conclusions follow from the following broad investment authority under A.C.A. § 28-69-605:
In addition to an investment otherwise authorized by law or by the applicable gift instrument, and without restriction to investments a fiduciary may make, the governing board, subject to any specific limitations set forth in the applicable gift instrument or in the applicable law other than law relating to investments by a fiduciary, may:
(1) invest and reinvest an institutional fund in any real or personal property deemed advisable by the governing board, whether or not it produces a current return, including mortgages, stocks, bonds, debentures, and other securities of profit or nonprofit corporations, shares in or obligations of associations, partnerships, or individuals, or obligations of any government or subdivision or instrumentality thereof;
(2) retain property contributed by a donor to an institutional fund for as long as the governing board deems advisable;
(3) include all or any part of an institutional fund in any pooled or common fund maintained by the institution; and
(4) invest all or any part of an institutional fund in any other pooled or common fund available for investment, including shares or interests in regulated investment companies, mutual funds, common trust funds, investment partnerships, real estate investment trusts, or similar organizations in which funds are commingled and investment determinations are made by persons other than the governing board.
(Emphasis added).
If for some reason UMIFA is inapplicable, on the other hand, then in my opinion the cash and stocks and bonds that have been bequeathed to the school districts constitute "public funds" under the Arkansas Code chapter captioned "Depositories for Public Funds," A.C.A. §§
Additionally, the cash in my opinion must be invested as "funds of [the ]school district" under comparatively limited statutory authority, if UMIFA is inapplicable. See A.C.A. §
As for whether the stocks and bonds must be converted to cash, I have found no clear authority on that issue. In the absence of a statutory directive to that effect, however, I believe the answer is probably "no." As stated above, absent UMIFA, the stocks and bonds in my opinion must be deposited in accordance with the Code chapter governing depositories for public funds. But I have found no requirement that such assets be converted to cash.
Assistant Attorney General Elisabeth A. Walker prepared the foregoing opinion, which I hereby approve.
Sincerely, DUSTIN McDANIEL Attorney General