Judges: MARK PRYOR, Attorney General
Filed Date: 5/7/1999
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 7/5/2016
The Honorable Jerry Don Ramey Prosecuting Attorney Fifteenth Judicial District 314 North 2nd, P.O. Box 381 Dardanelle, AR 72834
Dear Mr. Ramey:
You have requested an Attorney General opinion in response to the following question:
Must the activities listed in A.C.A. §
17-49-104 (a)(10), beginning with the term "flea markets" be school-related in order to be exempt from the licensing and other requirements that are applicable to transient merchants?
The intent of the legislature with regard to A.C.A. §
Until such clarification is forthcoming, it is my opinion (based upon the available rules of statutory interpretation) that the activities listed in A.C.A. §
A.C.A. §
(a) The provisions of this subchapter shall not apply to:
* * *
(10) School-sponsored bazaars and sales, concessions at school athletic and other events, and sales of paraphernalia used in the celebration of any nationally recognized holiday or used in connection with any public school, university, or college-related activities, flea markets, retail fireworks establishments, gun shows, sales by charitable organizations, sales of coins, and expositions sponsored by government entities or by nonprofit trade associations.
A.C.A. §
This statute is a part of the Transient Merchant Licensing Act. The original portions of that Act were passed in the regular session of 1983 as Act 587. The above-quoted section [A.C.A. §
It is hereby found and determined by the General Assembly that the provisions of Act 587 of 1983 are unreasonably broad and cover business enterprises never contemplated or intended; that if strictly interpreted and enforced, the Act as passed would severely restrict the opportunity for schools and school organizations to raise funds through bazaars and sales; that it is impractical to apply such Act to sales conducted by charitable organizations; that this Act is designed to clarify such law and to exempt certain types of sales from the application of the Act. . . .
Acts 1983, No. 113 (1st Ex. Sess.), Emergency Clause.
The title of the Act was as follows:
An Act to Amend Section 4 of Act 587 of 1983 to Exempt from the Transient Merchant Licensing Act School Sponsored Bazaars and Sales by Schools in Order to Eliminate an Unfair Financial Burden on Schools, and Thereby Allow the Schools to Spend Such Savings on Items and Services That Will Help Meet Minimum Standards; and for Other Purposes.
Acts 1983, No. 113 (1st Ex. Sess.), Title.
Although it is true that the foregoing emergency clause and title of Act 113 of 1983 seem to indicate that the amendment was intended to be aimed at creating an exemption for school-related sales, the language of the Act listing activities that are commonly understood to be non-school-related activities appears to indicate otherwise. Moreover, although the emergency clause and title of acts can be persuasive in interpreting legislation, the Arkansas Supreme Court has held that they should be referred to in determining legislative intent only in situations where the language of the act itself is ambiguous. Quinney v.Pittman,
Indeed, the court has repeatedly stated that the most basic rule of statutory construction is to give effect to the intent of the legislature, see, e.g., Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Ellison,
Accordingly, because the language of A.C.A. §
Activities such as flea markets, retail fireworks sales, gun shows, sales by charitable organizations, sales of coins, and expositions sponsored by government entities or by nonprofit trade associations are not commonly understood to entail any relation to school activities.
Moreover, as constructed, each clause of A.C.A. §
Under this interpretation, the activities listed in A.C.A. §
Assistant Attorney General Suzanne Antley prepared the foregoing opinion, which I hereby approve.
Sincerely,
MARK PRYOR Attorney General
MP:SBA/cyh
cc: Kelly Adkins, Deputy Prosecuting Attorney