Judges: MIKE BEEBE, Attorney General
Filed Date: 4/12/2006
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 7/5/2016
The Honorable Sue Madison State Senator 573 Rock Cliff Road Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701-3809
Dear Senator Madison:
I am writing in response to your request for an opinion on several questions regarding unclaimed bodies and a county's authority and responsibility in connection with such bodies. You state that your questions involve an interpretation of Arkansas Constitution, Article
1. Does an Arkansas county court or an Arkansas county judge have the authority to order the cremation of an unclaimed body?
2. If the answer is "yes," what degree of proof must be offered that the deceased was indeed a pauper and that there is no known next of kin? Does the presentation of such proof have to be offered in the form of an affidavit or verified petition?
3. What is the potential liability of a county that orders a body to be cremated if they have no authority to do so? What is the potential liability of a county that orders a body cremated and it is later found that family members were not notified?
4. Is a county responsible for paying for the costs of the cremation?
RESPONSE
The Arkansas Code sets out a procedure to be followed in connection with unclaimed bodies and it involves a search for next of kin and the giving of notice to the Department of Anatomy at the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences ("UAMS") for possible use of such bodies in anatomical research. Assuming that UAMS does not request delivery of the body, however, or in cases in which such bodies are not suitable for anatomical research, the law specifies that the person having possession, charge, or control of the body shall be notified, and the body shall then be disposed of in accordance with "existing laws, rules, and practices for disposing of unclaimed bodies." The trouble with this statement is that there are currently no other specific laws, rules and practices for disposing of unclaimed bodies. In my opinion, however, in response to your first question, the county court in all likelihood has the authority to enter a judicial order authorizing the cremation of an unclaimed body after following all of the procedures of applicable law, and in cases where the deceased is a "pauper." In response to your second question, the Arkansas Code requires a "diligent search" for the next of kin, which may involve requesting the county sheriff to conduct such search. I have found no requirement that the proof in this regard be offered by affidavit or verified petition. In response to your third question, the potential liability of a county for the actions you describe will depend upon all the applicable facts, taking into account any level of immunity afforded. In response to your fourth question, I can find no provision of law making it the responsibility of a county to pay for such cremations, but in my opinion a county is authorized to do so in the proper exercise of its authority.
Question 1 — Does an Arkansas county court or an Arkansas countyjudge have the authority to order the cremation of an unclaimedbody?
In my opinion, the county court in all likelihood has the authority to enter a judicial order authorizing the cremation of an unclaimed body after following all of the procedures of applicable law, and in cases where the deceased is a "pauper."
Section
Section
(a) Any person in charge of a prison, morgue, hospital, funeral parlor, or mortuary; any person who is a public officer, agent, or employee of the state, any county, or municipality; and all persons coming into possession, charge, or control of any human body which is unclaimed for burial shall notify the head of the Department of Anatomy, or his designate, as agent for the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, that the body, if unclaimed, is available for use in the advancement or study of medical science.
(b) For the purpose of notifying the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences of its availability, an "unclaimed body" is defined as a human body in the possession, charge, or control of the persons named in subsection (a) of this section for a period not to exceed forty-eight (48) hours, during which time the right of any relative, next of kin, friend, any representative of a fraternal society of which the deceased was a member, or a representative of any charitable or religious group to claim the body for burial purposes is recognized.
The immediately succeeding provision (§
Section
In response to your first question, therefore, in my opinion the procedure set out above must be followed in the case of an unclaimed body. If UAMS accepts the body for research, the applicable subchapter details the procedure that must be followed. If UAMS determines that it does not need the body for anatomical research, or that it is not suitable for research, the person in possession of the body is notified, and "the body is then disposed of in accordance with existing laws, rules, and practices for disposing of unclaimed bodies." A.C.A. §
Your first question in this regard is whether a county court or county judge has the authority to order the cremation of an unclaimed body. Current Arkansas statutes governing the county court and county judge do not address this power. As a general matter, counties are authorized, through quorum court ordinance, to provide "[c]emetery, burial, and memorial services." See
A.C.A. §
You mention Arkansas Constitution, art.
The county courts shall have exclusive original jurisdiction in all matters relating to county taxes, roads, bridges, ferries, paupers, bastardy, vagrants, the apprenticeship of minors, the disbursement of money for county purposes, and in every other case that may be necessary to the internal improvement and local concerns of the respective counties. The county court shall be held by one judge, except in cases otherwise herein provided.1
You focus on the reference to "paupers" in this section. Section
Paupers and illegitimates created an interrelated financial burden which seemed best managed at the county level during a time when welfare relief was not a major social phenomenon. Arkansas' system of poor relief was formally repealed in 1977, although it had long since been superseded by public welfare legislation on both the state and federal level.
Id. at 184. The former Arkansas statute making it the county court's duty to make an allowance for the burial of paupers was repealed by Act 742 of 1977. See Acts 1977, No. 742, § 117. No current statute imposes such a duty or mentions any such authority.2
Nonetheless, the county court retains jurisdiction over paupers. It may make orders pertaining to "administrative actions affecting the conduct of public human services programs serving indigent residents. . . ." A.C.A. §
None of the provisions of this subchapter shall affect the right of a coroner or a justice of the peace to hold the dead body as described under §
20-17-703 for the purpose of investigating the cause of death, nor shall this subchapter affect the right of any court of competent jurisdiction from entering an order affecting the disposition of the body.
(Emphasis added).
This statute acknowledges the right of a "court of competent jurisdiction" to enter an order affecting the disposition of the body. In my opinion this language would include a county court, in the exercise of its jurisdiction over "paupers," to enter a judicial order regarding the "disposition of the body" of a pauper.3 Your first question, however, is whether such an order may direct that the body be cremated. This issue is not addressed in A.C.A. §§
With regard to who may authorize the cremation of a body, A.C.A. §
(A) Authorizing Agent(s). An Authorizing Agent(s) is a person legally entitled to order the cremation of human remains. An authorizing agent shall be the next of kin of the deceased. In the absence of a next of kin, an order from a court of appropriate jurisdiction shall be obtained. In the case of indigents or any other individuals whose final disposition is the responsibility of the state, a public official charged with arranging the final disposition of the deceased, if legally authorized, may serve as the Authorizing Agent. In the case of individuals who have donated their bodies to science, and in which the institution is charged with making arrangements for the final disposition of the deceased, a representative of the institution, if legally authorized, may serve as the Authorizing Agent. If the deceased has authorized their own cremation by a pre-need arrangement, then any person acting on those instructions will be considered legally authorized, unless such authorization is in conflict with the wishes of the deceased's next of kin.
Cremation and Transport Service Rules and Regulations, Section 1(A).
As noted above, in my opinion a county court, acting in a judicial capacity, may order the cremation of the unclaimed body of a "pauper" after all relevant laws have been followed, including the notice to UAMS, and the "diligent search" required under applicable statutes. In cases involving paupers, an order of the county court is an order of "a court of competent jurisdiction" as mentioned in A.C.A. §
Question 2 — If the answer it "yes," what degree of proof mustbe offered that the deceased was indeed a pauper and that thereis no known next of kin? Does the presentation of such proof haveto be offered in the form of an affidavit or verified petition?
As noted above, A.C.A. §
Question 3 — What is the potential liability of a county thatorders a body to be cremated if they have no authority to do so?What is the potential liability of a county that orders a bodycremated and it is later found that family members were notnotified?
With regard to liability for interference with the right of next of kin to bury a body, the Arkansas Supreme Court has stated that:
A quasi-property right in dead bodies vests in the nearest relatives of the deceased, arising out of their duty to bury their dead. 22A Am.Jur.2d Dead Bodies § 3 (1988). See also Neff v. St. Paul Fire Marine Ins. Co.,
304 Ark. 18 ,799 S.W.2d 795 (1990). This right corresponds in extent to the duty from which it arises, and may include rights to possession and custody of the body for burial, to prevent the corpse from disturbances after burial, or to remove it to a proper place. Courts have generally based civil liability for wrongful acts with regard to a dead body on the interference with the right of burial. Id. Further, courts have recognized that there is a right to a decent burial which is guarded by the law, corresponding to the common law duty to bury one's dead in order to maintain public health and decency. Id. at § 13. Courts have, to a great extent, based civil liability for wrongful acts with regard to a dead body on the interference with the right of burial, recognizing that interference with the rights of person to bury the body of her spouse or kin is an actionable wrong, whether by mutilation of the body after death, the withholding of the body, or the conveyance of a communication which delays the person so entitled. Id. at § 35.
* * *
The rights to possession, custody, and control of the body for the purpose of burial are within the protection of the law, and a willful violator of such rights may become liable for damages. 22A Am.Jur.2d Dead Bodies § 35 (1988). The Restatement of Torts takes the view that one who intentionally, recklessly, or negligently withholds the body of a dead person or prevents its proper interment or cremation is subject to liability to a member of the family of the deceased who is entitled to the disposition of the body. Restatement (Second) of Torts § 868.
The Travelers Insurance Company v. Smith,
In addition, Section II ("Cremation Rules and Regulations"), § (F)(1)(a) of the of the Board of Embalmers and Funeral Directors Rules states that:
Any person signing a cremation authorization form shall be deemed to warrant the truthfulness of any facts set forth in the cremation authorization form, including the identity of the deceased whose remains are sought to be cremated and that person's authority to order such cremation. Any person signing a cremation authorization form shall be personally and individually liable for all damage occasioned thereby and resulting therefrom.
Any discussion of the liability of a county in this regard, however, would have to include consideration of the statutory immunity afforded counties in tort actions. As I recently stated in Op. Att'y. Gen.
I have described the immunity from liability available to counties in previous opinions. See Op. Att'y Gen.2003-266 . Specifically, A.C.A. §21-9-301 addresses a county's potential liability stating:It is declared to be the public policy of the State of Arkansas that all counties . . . of the state and any of their boards, commissions, agencies, authorities, or other governing bodies shall be immune from liability and from suit except to the extent that they may be covered by liability insurance. No tort action shall lie against any such political subdivision because of the acts of its agents or employees.
Id. This provision has been applied only to situations involving tort liability. See City of Caddo Valley v. George,
340 Ark. 203 ,9 S.W.3d 481 (2000). Furthermore, the Arkansas Supreme Court has extended this immunity to the officers and employees of the political subdivisions when the officers or employees commit negligent acts or omissions in their official capacities. See, e.g., Autrey v. Lawrence,286 Ark. 501 ,696 S.W.2d 315 (1985). This immunity, however, does not extend to intentional torts committed by public officials. See, e.g., West Memphis Sch. Dist. No. 4 v. Circuit Court,316 Ark. 290 ,871 S.W.2d 368 (1994).Generally speaking, a county will therefore be immune from liability in State court for negligent actions committed by the employees or officers of the county within the scope of their duties except to the extent that the county has liability insurance.
* * *
Additionally, if the county were sued in federal court, a different standard would apply. In federal court, the county may be able to claim "qualified immunity." Qualified immunity applies to the actions of individual officers and employees who undertook the performance of their governmental duties in good faith and whose actions did not violate a clearly established constitutional right. Saucier v. Katz,533 U.S. 194 (2001). This is a test of the "objective legal reasonableness of the action" viewed in the context of the "clearly established" legal rules at the time the action was taken. Id. Again, this question would be one of fact.
Id. at 2-3.
As noted above, the potential liability of a county that orders a body to be cremated without authority or without notifying family members would depend upon all the facts and circumstances. I cannot determine the issue in the absence of any such facts. In addition, counties with questions in this regard should consult with their local counsel.
Question 4 — Is a county responsible for paying for the costs ofthe cremation?
I have found no statute imposing the costs of cremation of unclaimed bodies on counties. As set out earlier, in cases where UAMS accepts a body for anatomical research, the costs of disposition are governed by A.C.A. §§
Deputy Attorney General Elana C. Wills prepared the foregoing opinion, which I hereby approve.
Sincerely,
MIKE BEEBE Attorney General
MB:ECW/cyh