Judges: WINSTON BRYANT, Attorney General
Filed Date: 1/11/1996
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 7/5/2016
The Honorable Wayne Wagner State Representative P.O. Box 909 Manila, Arkansas 72442-0909
Dear Representative Wagner:
This opinion is being issued in response to your recent questions regarding retirement benefits for city treasurers.
You have presented a fact situation in which an individual began employment with the city of Manila as a bookkeeper in 1975. In January, 1983, she was appointed to the position of city treasurer, in which position she served until April 1, 1995. She was therefore employed by the city for twenty years, twelve years of which she served as city treasurer. This individual has now requested that the city credit her with fifteen years of service as city treasurer so as to enable her to receive retirement benefits under the provisions of A.C.A. §
With regard to this fact situation, you have requested that this office answer the following questions:
(1) Can the Manila city council credit the individual in question with sufficient employment time so as to qualify her for retirement benefits under A.C.A. §
24-12-125 ?(2) If so, can the city council establish a percentage of her service time as city treasurer for pay purposes and then fund for retirement at 50% of the appropriate salary scale?
RESPONSE
Question 1 — Can the Manila city council credit the individual inquestion with sufficient employment time so as to qualify her forretirement benefits under A.C.A. §
It is my opinion that the Manila city council cannot credit the individual with sufficient employment time so as to qualify her for retirement benefits under A.C.A. §
Your question appears to acknowledge the clear conclusion that the individual in question cannot receive retirement benefits under the plain language of A.C.A. §
(a) Upon approval of the governing body of any city of the first class, any person who has served as city treasurer of the city for a period of fifteen (15) years and who shall retire from office or be succeeded by another city treasurer shall, upon reaching sixty (60) years of age, receive, for the remainder of his life, the retirement pay provided for in this section.
A.C.A. §
This conclusion, however, in and of itself leaves unanswered the question of whether the Manila city council can circumvent the requirements of A.C.A. §
Municipalities are creatures of the state and can exercise only such authority as has been explicitly delegated to them by the state. Jonesv. American Home Life Ins. Co.,
Although municipalities have been granted the authority to create retirement plans for city treasurers other than the plan provided under A.C.A. §
I must therefore conclude that the Manila city council does not have the authority to circumvent the fifteen-year requirement of A.C.A. §
Question 2 — If so, can the city council establish a percentage of herservice time as city treasurer for pay purposes and then fund forretirement at 50% of the appropriate salary scale?
Because I have opined that the city council may not credit the individual in question with additional years of service for purposes of A.C.A. §
The foregoing opinion, which I hereby approve, was prepared by Assistant Attorney General Suzanne Antley.
Sincerely,
WINSTON BRYANT Attorney General
WB:SBA/cyh