Judges: WINSTON BRYANT, Attorney General
Filed Date: 7/31/1997
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 7/5/2016
The Honorable Sharon Priest Secretary of State State Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201-1094
Dear Ms. Priest:
This is in response to your request for an opinion concerning candidate filing and voter registration deadlines. You have presented the issues as follows:
When a candidate filing deadline or a deadline for registering to vote falls on a Saturday or Sunday when the election official or clerk's office is normally closed, can the election official accept the filings on the following Monday? If not, should the election official set the deadline on the Friday preceding the deadline, or should the election official open his/her office on the deadline day? What is the procedure if the deadline falls on a holiday: is the deadline the day before, or the day after the holiday?
For example, the filing deadline for candidates in the upcoming school election is August 2, a Saturday. Is Friday, August 1 the deadline that the election officials should use?
With regard, first, to candidate filing deadlines, the answer to your question concerning the upcoming school election applies equally to your questions regarding candidate filing deadlines generally. I will thus address these issues as they pertain, specifically, to the school election filing deadline. My response is intended to apply as well, however, to your general questions in this regard.
Although the answer to these questions is by no means clear due to the absence of Arkansas case law authority on point, it is my opinion that a school election candidate who filed on the Monday following the Saturday deadline1 would in all likelihood have a good argument that the filing should be accepted where the office was closed on Saturday. Even if the office was open on Saturday, it is possible that the Monday filing would be upheld, depending upon the particular circumstances, as discussed further herein. Thus, while there would be no harm in notifying candidates that their filings should be made on the Friday preceding the Saturday deadline, it is in my opinion unlikely that Friday would be deemed the legal deadline.
According to my research, our law makes no provision for a situation such as this where the candidate filing deadline falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or a legal holiday. Rule 6 of the Arkansas Rules of Civil Procedure is inapplicable, in accordance with Rule 1 thereof which provides that the rules govern "the procedure in the circuit, chancery, and probate courts in all suits or actions of a civil nature. . . ." (Emphasis added). There are cases involving judicial proceedings wherein the Arkansas Supreme Court adopted a common law rule extending the deadline to Monday where the last day for an act to be done falls on a Sunday. See McNutt v.State,
While I thus cannot predict with certainty an Arkansas court's approach to the issue, there are cases from other jurisdictions holding that the statutory deadline should be extended if the candidate had no opportunity to file on the deadline, or no notice of such an opportunity. See, e.g.,Keating v. Iozzo,
Assuming, therefore, that our court is willing to look to other jurisdictions on this issue, general authority exists for the proposition that a Monday filing should not be deemed outside the statutorily prescribed school election filing period where the clerk's office is closed on Saturday.2
With regard to opening the office on a Saturday, or on a Sunday or a holiday when the office is normally closed, my research has yielded no legal requirement that the office be open under these circumstances. The mere fact that the deadline happens to fall on a day when the office is normally closed does not appear to automatically mandate that the office be opened on that day. There may, on the other hand, be no legal impediment to opening the office.3 This would presumably be within the clerk's discretion. See, however, n. 3., supra. Even if the clerk chose to open the office, however, I believe the particular circumstances would have to be considered in determining whether a candidate could still file on the following Monday. In the Illinois cases cited above,notice was a significant factor in the court's approach to the statutory deadline. The party who had no notice that the office would be open for filing was not bound by a final date falling on a Saturday when the office was not required to be open. See also John Allen Co. v. SesserConcrete Products Co., 114 Ill, App. 2d 186,
On the other hand, where the party had notice of the opportunity to comply and could show no hardship resulting from limitations on the opportunity, extension of a statutory deadline was disfavored. Keating v.Iozzo, supra. The elements of notice and opportunity may therefore have to be considered in deciding whether a Monday filing should be accepted where the office was open on the Saturday deadline. This will, it seems, require a case-by-case determination.
In conclusion as to this issue, therefore, it is my opinion that a filing should probably be accepted on Monday, which is obviously less than 45 days before the school election, in view of the fact that the last day for filing falls on a Saturday, assuming that the office was closed on Saturday or that there was no legal requirement that it be open or no notice otherwise that it would be open. Thus, in my opinion, Friday, August 1, should not be considered the legal deadline.
In response to your inquiry in this regard concerning voter registration deadlines, I believe a similar argument could be made that the legislature did not intend for any rule to require an applicant to do something which cannot be done. Although Amendment
The foregoing opinion, which I hereby approve, was prepared by Assistant Attorney General Elisabeth A. Walker.
Sincerely,
WINSTON BRYANT Attorney General
WB:EAW/cyh
Keating v. Iozzo , 155 Ill. App. 3d 774 ( 1987 )
Pettigrove v. Parro Construction Corp. , 44 Ill. App. 2d 421 ( 1963 )
John Allan Co. v. Sesser Concrete Products Co. , 114 Ill. App. 2d 186 ( 1969 )
Burgess v. Erickson , 72 Ill. App. 2d 85 ( 1966 )