Judges: STEVE CLARK, Attorney General
Filed Date: 4/19/1989
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 7/5/2016
The Honorable Luther "Lu" Hardin State Senator 309 South Vancouver Russellville, AR 72801
Dear Senator Hardin:
This is in response to your request for an opinion on the following question:
Is the Board of Commissioners of a Fire Protection District as established under the provisions of Act 35 of 1979, a County Advisory Board or a County Administrative Board, and are the appointments of such board members bound by A.C.A.
14-14-705 ?
It is my opinion, in response to the first part of this question, that the Board of Commissioners of a Fire Protection District established under Act 35 of 1979 is neither a County Advisory Board nor a County Administrative Board for purposes of A.C.A.
These conclusions are compelled by a review of Act 35 of 1979 (A.C.A.
The appointment of a board of commissioners for such a fire protection district ("district") is governed by A.C.A
(b)(1) Two (2) members of the commission shall be appointed for terms of two (2) years and three (3) members of the commission shall be appointed for terms of three (3) years.
(2) All successor members shall be appointed by the county court for terms of three (3) years. All appointments shall be subject to confirmation by the quorum court of the county.
(c) Vacancies occurring on the board because of resignation, removal, or otherwise shall be filled by the county court for the unexpired term.
A comparison between
These differences, as well as the fact that the board of commissioners of a fire improvement district is established under a separate, specific legislative scheme, compel the conclusion that provisions governing county advisory and administrative boards, generally, do not encompass the board of commissioners of a fire improvement district created pursuant to Act 35 of 1979 (A.C.A.
The foregoing opinion, which I hereby approve, was prepared by Assistant Attorney General Elisabeth A. Walker.
Sincerely,
STEVE CLARK Attorney General
SC:arb