DocketNumber： No. 11-0595-NA
Citation Numbers： 70 M.J. 347, 2011 CAAF LEXIS 744
Filed Date： 9/13/2011
Status： Precedential
Modified Date： 10/18/2024
CCA 200900574. Review granted on the following issue:
WHETHER AN ARTICLE 134 CLAUSE 1 OR 2 SPECIFICATION THAT FAILS TO EXPRESSLY ALLEGE EITHER POTENTIAL TERMINAL ELEMENT STATES AN OFFENSE UNDER THE SUPREME COURT’S HOLDINGS IN UNITED STATES v. RESENDIZ-PONCE AND RUSSELL v. UNITED STATES, AND THIS COURT’S OPINION IN UNITED STATES v. FOSLER, 70 M.J. 225 (C.A.A.F. 2011).
No briefs will be filed under Rule 25.