DocketNumber： No. 09-0519-NA
Citation Numbers： 71 M.J. 8, 2011 CAAF LEXIS 1088
Filed Date： 12/20/2011
Status： Precedential
Modified Date： 10/18/2024
CCA 200601124. Review granted on the following issue:
WHETHER AN ARTICLE 134 CLAUSE 1 OR 2 SPECIFICATION THAT FAILS TO EXPRESSLY ALLEGE EITHER POTENTIAL TERMINAL ELEMENT STATES AN OFFENSE UNDER THE SUPREME COURT’S HOLDINGS IN UNITED STATES v. RESENDIZ-PONCE AND RUSSELL v. UNITED STATES, AND THIS COURT’S OPINION IN UNITED STATES v. FOSLER, 70 M.J. 225 (C.A.A.F. 2011).
Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.