DocketNumber: 08-08 349
Filed Date: 3/31/2014
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 4/18/2021
Citation Nr: 1413848 Decision Date: 03/31/14 Archive Date: 04/10/14 DOCKET NO. 08-08 349 ) DATE ) On appeal from the Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office in San Diego, California THE ISSUE Entitlement to specially adapted housing. REPRESENTATION Veteran represented by: Disabled American Veterans WITNESS AT HEARING ON APPEAL The Veteran ATTORNEY FOR THE BOARD Zi-Heng Zhu, General Attorney INTRODUCTION The Veteran had active service from March 1942 to February 1948, and from February 1950 to April 1964. This matter was originally before the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) on appeal from a July 2007 decision of the San Diego, California Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Regional Office (RO). In August 2010, the Veteran appeared at a hearing before a Veterans Law Judge (VLJ). In April 2012, the Board issued a decision that denied the claim of entitlement to specially adapted housing. ORDER TO VACATE The Board may vacate an appellate decision at any time upon request of the appellant or his or her representative, or on the Board's own motion, when an appellant has been denied due process of law.38 U.S.C.A. § 7104
(a) (West 2002);38 C.F.R. § 20.904
(2013). In September 2013, pursuant to a settlement agreement in the case of National Org. of Veterans' Advocates, Inc. v. Secretary of Veterans Affairs,725 F.3d 1312
(Fed. Cir. 2013), the Board sent the Veteran a letter notifying him of an opportunity to receive a new decision from the Board that would correct any potential due process error relating to the duties of the VLJ that conducted the August 2010 hearing. See Bryant v. Shinseki,23 Vet. App. 488
(2010) (holding that the requirements of38 C.F.R. § 3.103
(c)(2) apply to a hearing before the Board and that a VLJ has a duty to explain fully the issues and to suggest the submission of evidence that may have been overlooked). In November 2013, the Veteran responded that he wished to have the prior decision vacated and a new one issued in its place. Accordingly, the April 2012 Board decision is vacated. ____________________________________________ D. C. SPICKLER Veterans Law Judge, Board of Veterans' Appeals