Anvari v. United States Depart

[NOT FOR PUBLICATION NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]
United States Court of Appeals
For the First Circuit
No. 98-2203
JAMSHED ANVARI,
Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
WILLIAM A. CONTE, EDITH NOURSE ROGERS VETERANS
ADMINISTRATION HOSPITAL, FRANCES JULIE FUSCO,
JOEL ARNOLD, MICHAEL CAREY, JOAN MILNER
AND UNITED STATES,
Defendants, Appellees.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
[Hon. Nancy Gertner, U.S. District Judge]
Before
Selya, Circuit Judge,
Bownes, Senior Circuit Judge,
and Stahl, Circuit Judge.
Jamshed Anvari on brief pro se.
Donald K. Stern, United States Attorney, and Michael J.
Pineault, Assistant U.S. Attorney, on brief for appellees.
July 15, 1999
Per Curiam. Pro se plaintiff Jamshed Anvari appeals
a district court order that summarily dismissed his complaint
based on the defendants' motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed. R.
Civ. P. 12(b)(1), (5), and (6). Having thoroughly reviewed the
record and the parties' briefs on appeal, we conclude that the
order of dismissal is correct. Plaintiff's claims are wholly
preempted by the remedies available to him under civil service
law. See, e.g., Berry v. Hollander, 925 F.2d 311, 314-16 (9th
Cir. 1991); Heaney v. United States Veterans Administration,
756 F.2d 1215, 1220 (5th Cir. 1985); Premachandra v. United
States, 739 F.2d 392, 394 (8th Cir. 1984); Roth v. United
States, 952 F.2d 611, 614 (1st Cir. 1991); Berrios v. Dep't of
the Army, 884 F.2d 28, 30 (1st Cir. 1989); Maniktahla v. John
J. Pershing VA Medical Center, 967 F. Supp. 379, 381-82 (E.D.
Mo. 1997); Hicks v. Brown 929 F. Supp. 1184, 1187-89 (E.D. Ark.
1996); Gregor v. Derwinski, 911 F. Supp. 643 (W.D.N.Y. 1996).
Consequently, we need not address the parties' remaining
arguments.
Affirmed. See Local Rule 27.1.