DocketNumber： 94-1728
Filed Date： 10/11/1994
Status： Precedential
Modified Date： 9/21/2015
October 7, 1994 [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
____________________
No. 94-1728
IN RE: WILLIAM J. BURGESS,
Appellant.
____________________
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
[Hon. Martin F. Loughlin, Senior U.S. District Judge]
__________________________
____________________
Before
Selya, Cyr and Boudin,
Circuit Judges.
______________
____________________
William J. Burgess on brief pro se.
__________________
____________________
____________________
Per Curiam. The district court did not abuse its
___________
discretion in denying the request to proceed in forma
pauperis, see Temple v. Ellerthorpe, 586 F. Supp. 848 (D.R.I.
___ ______ ___________
1984) (discussing the discretionary nature of this
determination), nor did it fail to give an adequate
explanation, assuming it were obliged to do so, for its
ruling.
Affirmed.
_________
-3-