DocketNumber： 96-1815
Filed Date： 4/3/1997
Status： Precedential
Modified Date： 9/21/2015
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
____________________
No. 96-1815
DEBRA L. MORGAN,
Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
BOSTON REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, ET AL.,
Defendants, Appellees.
____________________
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
[Hon. Patti B. Saris, U.S. District Judge] ___________________
____________________
Before
Cyr, Stahl and Lynch,
Circuit Judges. ______________
____________________
Debra L. Morgan on brief pro se. _______________
Rebecca J. Wilson, William V. Hoch and Peabody & Arnold on brief _________________ ________________ ________________
for appellees.
____________________
March 19, 1997
____________________
Per Curiam. Even assuming appellant Debra L. ___________
Morgan held a property interest in her position of employment
with the Boston Redevelopment Authority, a careful review of
the record and the parties' briefs on appeal satisfies us
that the district court correctly ruled that Morgan failed to
demonstrate a trialworthy issue as to whether the defendants
acted arbitrarily and capriciously in terminating her
employment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the district
court in this regard for essentially the reasons stated in
its Memorandum and Order, dated May 22, 1996.
Affirmed. See Local Rule 27.1. ________ ___
-2-