Doral Mortgage v. Echevarria

USCA1 Opinion

[Not for Publication]

United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

____________________

                                   No. 97-9010



                  IN RE:  NANCY M. OLIVER ECHEVARRIA,



                                Debtor.



                         _____________________



DORAL MORTGAGE CORP.,



Appellant,



v.



NANCY M. OLIVER ECHEVARRIA, ET AL.,



Appellees.



____________________



ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY

APPELLATE PANEL FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT



____________________



Before



 Torruella, Chief Judge,

Campbell, Senior Circuit Judge,

and Stahl, Circuit Judge.



____________________



                                       Ronald L. Rosenbaum and Woods & Rosenbaum on brief for appellants.

                         ____________________

March 31, 1998

                                     ____________________    Per curiam.  We have carefully considered appellant's arguments, yet we see in them no basis for disturbing the conclusions of the bankruptcy appellate panel.  As we have noted on countless occasions: "[W]hen a lower court produces a comprehensive, well-reasoned decision, an appellate court should refrain from writing at length to no other end than to hear its own words resonate."  Sunview Condominium Assoc. v. Flexel Int'l, Ltd., 116 F.3d 962, 965 (1st Cir. 1997) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted).  So it is here.

      Affirmed.  No costs.