Junius E. Davis v. Unifirst Corporation, and Terry Newman Herbert Marshall

70 F.3d 1261

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Junius E. DAVIS, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
UNIFIRST CORPORATION, Defendant--Appellee,
and
Terry Newman; Herbert Marshall, Defendants.

No. 94-2638.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 16, 1995.
Decided Nov. 27, 1995.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Lynchburg. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-94-28-L)

Junius E. Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Sekin Leebrick, THOMAS S. LEEBRICK, P.C. Lynchburg, Virginia; John Ernest Falcone, SMITH & FALCONE, Lynchburg, Virginia, for Appellee.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order granting Appellee's motion for summary judgment on Appellant's claim of retaliation for filing an employment discrimination claim. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Davis v. Unifirst, No. CA-94-28-L (W.D.Va. Nov. 23, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.