Rupprecht v. City of Pittsfield

Not for Publication in West's Federal Reporter
United States Court of Appeals
For the First Circuit
No. 06-2767
WILLIAM RUPPRECHT,
Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
CITY OF PITTSFIELD, ET AL.,
Defendants, Appellees.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
[Hon. Kenneth P. Neiman, U.S. Magistrate Judge]
Before
Boudin, Chief Judge,
Campbell, Senior Circuit Judge,
and Lynch, Circuit Judge.
William Rupprecht on brief pro se.
Nancy Frankel Pelletier and Robinson Donovan, P.C. on brief
for appellees.
May 31, 2007
Per Curiam. After carefully considering the briefs and
record on appeal, we affirm the judgment below. McCord v. Horace
Mann Ins. Co., 390 F.3d 138 (1st Cir. 2004)(de novo review).
Among other problems, land-use conflicts rarely support
constitutional claims. Extreme circumstances are required to
support substantive due process or equal protection claims.
Exhaustion of state remedies is a prerequisite for procedural due
process and Fifth Amendment takings claims. SFW Arecibo, LTD v.
Rodriguez, 415 F.3d 135 (1st Cir. 2005). Appellant made no showing
that he satisfied any of these requirements.
Affirmed. See 1st Cir. R. 27.0(c).
-2-