DocketNumber: 98-2143
Citation Numbers: 205 F.3d 1
Filed Date: 5/17/2000
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 4/14/2017
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 98-2143 ARNOLD W. VINICK, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, Appellee. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. Robert E. Keeton, U.S. District Judge] ERRATA SHEET The opinion of this Court issued on March 8, 2000, is amended as follows: Page 20, line 9: Add a new footnote number “8” after the period ending the sentence: “Responsibility during one period does not equate to responsibility in all periods.” The text for the new footnote 8 is as follows: “We do not mean to suggest that in all § 6672 cases a district court is precluded from considering evidence from outside the quarters in question. For example, behavior in one quarter, depending on the circumstances, could cast light on one's status as a responsible person in other quarters. Because one's function and status can change between quarters, however, it would be erroneous based solely on evidence from one quarter automatically to conclude that a person is responsible in another quarter.” Alter the subsequent footnotes' numbering accordingly.
Aadland v. Boat Santa Rita II, Inc. ( 2022 )
Harrison v. United States , 284 F.3d 293 ( 2002 )
Moulton v. United States , 429 F.3d 352 ( 2005 )
Vinick v. United States , 205 F.3d 1 ( 2000 )
Lubetzky v. United States , 393 F.3d 76 ( 2004 )
Paul Jean v. United States , 396 F.3d 449 ( 2005 )
Lyon v. United States ( 2003 )
In Re Aboody , 250 B.R. 1 ( 2000 )
Smith v. United States , 555 F.3d 1158 ( 2009 )
Bamberg v. Goldman, Sachs & Co. , 771 F.3d 37 ( 2014 )
Jean v. United States ( 2005 )