DocketNumber: 96-1082
Filed Date: 7/18/1997
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 4/17/2021
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION] [NOT FOR PUBLICATION] UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT No. 97-1082 LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, Appellee, v. CATERINA A. ROSENTHAL, ET AL., Defendants, Appellants. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. Richard G. Stearns, U.S. District Judge] Before Selya, Circuit Judge, Cyr, Senior Circuit Judge, and Lagueux*, District Judge. Evan T. Lawson, with whom J. Mark Dickison and Lawson & Weitzen, LLP were on brief, for appellants. Michael J. Keefe, with whom James E. Harvey, Jr., O'Malley and Harvey, Kenneth A. Latronico, and Latronico & Whitestone were on brief, for appellee. July 18, 1997 *Of the District of Rhode Island, sitting by designation. Per Curiam. We have reviewed the record on appeal with Per Curiam. care, read the parties' briefs, and entertained oral argument. We find that the district court's order granting equitable relief pendente lite is grounded on substantial evidence in the record, meets the requirements we have laid down for the granting of preliminary injunctive relief, see, e.g., Narragansett Indian Tribe v. Guilbert,934 F.2d 4
, 5 (1st Cir. 1991), and does not appear to represent an unreasonable application of pertinent legal principles. Consequently, we summarily affirm the order. The appellants may, of course, raise their factual and legal arguments anew at the trial on the merits. Affirmed. Affirmed. 2