United States v. Dustin Nathaniel Miller

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FILED
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
May 7, 2009
No. 08-14190 THOMAS K. KAHN
Non-Argument Calendar CLERK
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 06-00277
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
DUSTIN NATHANIEL MILLER,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Alabama
_________________________
(May 7, 2009)
Before BIRCH, HULL and HILL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Richard Earl Shields, appointed counsel for Dustin Miller in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.
1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Miller’s conviction and sentence
are AFFIRMED.
2