DocketNumber： 04-12691
Filed Date： 4/20/2005
Status： Non-Precedential
Modified Date： 12/21/2014
[DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED ________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT April 20, 2005 No. 04-12691 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK ________________________ D. C. Docket Nos. 02-00360-CV-4-RH and 99-00071-CR-4-R LAWRENCE LOMBARDI, Petitioner-Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent-Appellee. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _________________________ (April 20, 2005) Before TJOFLAT, ANDERSON and WILSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: In this appeal, appellant challenges the district court’s decision rejecting his Fed. R. Crim. P. 33 motion for new trial based on newly discovered evidence as time-barred because the motion was not filed within the three-year limitations period the rule prescribes. Rule 33's limitations periods are jurisdictional. United States v. Bramlett,116 F. 3d 1403
, 1405 (11th Cir. 1997). The district court therefore lacked jurisdiction to consider appellant’s motion. AFFIRMED. 2