United States v. Mikel Wayne Nunnally

USCA11 Case: 21-13722 Date Filed: 06/13/2022 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit
____________________
No. 21-13722
Non-Argument Calendar
____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MIKEL WAYNE NUNNALLY,
Defendant-Appellant.
____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
D.C. Docket No. 6:21-cr-00007-PGB-GJK-1
____________________
USCA11 Case: 21-13722 Date Filed: 06/13/2022 Page: 2 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 21-13722
Before JORDAN, NEWSOM, and LUCK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Stephen Langs, appointed counsel for Mikel Nunnally in this
direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further repre-
sentation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the en-
tire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of
the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the en-
tire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to
withdraw is GRANTED, and Nunnally’s convictions and sentences
are AFFIRMED.