United States v. Stoufflet

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FILED
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUITU.S. COURT OF APPEALS
________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
APR 22, 2011
No. 10-13128 JOHN LEY
CLERK
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:08-cr-00082-CC-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
CHRISTOPHER STOUFFLET,
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Georgia
________________________
(April 22, 2011)
Before BARKETT, MARCUS and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Mary Erickson, appointed counsel for Christopher Stoufflet in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.
1396, 8 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Stoufflet has filed a pro se motion for the
appointment of new counsel. Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, Stoufflet’s motion for the
appointment of new counsel is DENIED, and Stoufflet’s conviction and sentence
are AFFIRMED.
2