United States v. Brandon Leross Bailey

USCA11 Case: 22-11277 Document: 16-1 Date Filed: 01/06/2023 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit
____________________
No. 22-11277
Non-Argument Calendar
____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
BRANDON LEROSS BAILEY,
Defendant-Appellant.
____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Alabama
D.C. Docket No. 1:20-cr-00171-CG-B-1
____________________
USCA11 Case: 22-11277 Document: 16-1 Date Filed: 01/06/2023 Page: 2 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 22-11277
Before ROSENBAUM, JILL PRYOR, and BRASHER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Michael D. Hickman, appointed counsel for Brandon Bailey
in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further
representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the
entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit
of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion
to withdraw is GRANTED, and Bailey’s convictions and sentences
are AFFIRMED.