DocketNumber： No. 10-10193
Citation Numbers： 395 F. App'x 667
Judges： Carnes, Hill, Marcus
Filed Date： 9/14/2010
Status： Precedential
Modified Date： 11/5/2024
We have carefully reviewed the record and briefs. We conclude that the district court correctly dismissed the complaint.
The statements of conclusions without fact averments do not and did not meet the plausibility standard of Randall v. Scott, 610 F.3d 701 (11th Cir.2010).
Appellant did not and has not moved for permission to amend the complaint. No amendment was filed or proffered.
AFFIRMED.