DocketNumber: 23-10897
Filed Date: 6/7/2023
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 6/7/2023
USCA11 Case: 23-10897 Document: 14-1 Date Filed: 06/07/2023 Page: 1 of 4 [DO NOT PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-10773 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JULIUS CALHOUN, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama D.C. Docket No. 2:22-cr-00167-ECM-SMD-4 ____________________ USCA11 Case: 23-10897 Document: 14-1 Date Filed: 06/07/2023 Page: 2 of 4 2 Opinion of the Court 23-10773 ____________________ No. 23-10897 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JULIUS CALHOUN, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama D.C. Docket No. 2:22-cr-00167-ECM-SMD-4 ____________________ Before JILL PRYOR, GRANT, and LAGOA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Upon our review of the record and the response to the juris- dictional questions, we DISMISS both of these appeals for lack of jurisdiction. First, as Appellant acknowledges, a notice of appeal USCA11 Case: 23-10897 Document: 14-1 Date Filed: 06/07/2023 Page: 3 of 4 23-10773 Opinion of the Court 3 must designate already existing orders, and we do not have juris- diction to review future court orders. See Bogle v. Orange Cnty. Bd. of Cnty. Comm’rs,162 F.3d 653
, 661 (11th Cir. 1998). Appellant’s ap- peal of an anticipated ruling on his motion to dismiss the indict- ment is thus not proper. Second, the district court’s March 1, 2023 order granting the government’s motion to continue trial is not immediately appeala- ble under the collateral order doctrine. That order did not conclu- sively find Appellant incompetent and commit him to the custody of the Attorney General. See United States v. Donofrio,896 F.2d 1301
(11th Cir. 1990) (holding that an order finding a defendant incom- petent to stand trial and committing him to the custody of the At- torney General was an immediately-appealable collateral order). Instead, the district court delayed the criminal proceedings until its previously-ordered commitment could occur, and a challenge to that delay is akin to a speedy trial challenge, which is not reviewa- ble on interlocutory appeal. See United States v. MacDonald,435 U.S. 850
, 857 (1978). Accordingly, appeal no. 23-10773 is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. Further, because our dismissal of appeal no. 23-10773 will lift the district court’s March 16, 2023 order staying the pro- ceedings pending that appeal, appeal no. 23-10897, which chal- lenges that order, is DISMISSED as MOOT. See Christian Coal. of Fla., Inc. v. United States,662 F.3d 1182
, 1189 (11th Cir. 2011) (providing that an issue is moot “when it no longer presents a live USCA11 Case: 23-10897 Document: 14-1 Date Filed: 06/07/2023 Page: 4 of 4 4 Opinion of the Court 23-10773 controversy with respect to which the court can give meaningful relief.”). All pending motions are DENIED as MOOT.