DocketNumber: 23-13756
Filed Date: 12/19/2023
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 12/19/2023
USCA11 Case: 23-13756 Document: 17-1 Date Filed: 12/19/2023 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-13756 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________ TARA DUNCAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus PEARSON EDUCATION, INC., et al, Defendants, NCS PEARSON, INC., Defendant-Appellee. ____________________ USCA11 Case: 23-13756 Document: 17-1 Date Filed: 12/19/2023 Page: 2 of 2 2 Opinion of the Court 23-13756 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 9:22-cv-80285-AMC ____________________ Before ROSENBAUM, BRASHER, and ABUDU, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdic- tion. Tara Duncan appeals from the district court’s dismissal of her claims against NCS Pearson, Inc. (“Pearson”). We lack jurisdiction to review the order because it is not a final order adjudicating the rights and liabilities of all of the parties, as Duncan’s claims against the other defendants remain pending in the district court. See28 U.S.C. § 1291
; Supreme Fuels Trading FZE v. Sargeant,689 F.3d 1244
, 1246 (11th Cir. 2012). Moreover, the district court did not certify its order under Rule 54(b). See Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b). No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all other applicable rules.