DocketNumber: No. 05-6164-ag
Judges: Feinberg, Hon, Parker, Straub
Filed Date: 8/24/2006
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/5/2024
SUMMARY ORDER
Petitioners Ahmet Ramusevic, Suzana Ramusevic, Elizabeta Ramusevic, and Ibrahim Ramusevic, natives of the former Yugoslavia and citizens of the former state of Serbia-Montenegro, seek review of an October 25, 2005 order of the BIA affirming the May 4, 2004 decision of Immigration Judge (“IJ”) Barbara Nelson denying Ahmet Ramusevic’s applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). In re Ramusevic, Nos. A79 318 964, A79 318 965, A79 318 966, A79 318 967 (B.I.A. Oct. 25, 2005), aff'g, Nos. A79 318 964, A79 318 965, A79 318 966, A79 318 967 (Immig. Ct. N.Y. City May 4, 2004). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and procedural history of the case.
Where, as here, the BIA adopts, affirms, and supplements the IJ’s decision, we review the IJ’s decision as supplemented by the BIA. See Yu Yin Yang v. Gonzales, 431 F.3d 84, 85 (2d Cir.2005). Legal questions, and the application of law to fact, are reviewed de novo. See Secaida-Rosales v. INS, 331 F.3d 297, 307 (2d Cir.2003). We review the agency’s factual findings under the substantial evidence standard, treating them as “conclusive unless any reasonable adjudicator would be compelled to conclude to the contrary.” 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B); see, e.g., Zhou Yun Zhang v. INS, 386 F.3d 66, 73 & n. 7 (2d Cir.2004). However, we will vacate and remand for new findings if the agency’s reasoning or its fact-finding process was sufficiently flawed. Cao He Lin v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice, 428 F.3d 391, 406 (2d Cir.2005).
As Ramusevic failed to demonstrate past persecution, he was not entitled to the presumption of a well-founded fear, see 8 C.F.R. § 1208.13(b)(1); he also failed to establish that element independently. According to the State Department report for 2003, the government of Montenegro generally respects the rights of its citizens, Christian and Muslim communities coexist peacefully, and discrimination and harassment against ethnic Albanians is not pervasive. The report noted that the Montenegrin government was operating largely independently of Serbia in 2003, and we take judicial notice of Montenegro’s emergence as an independent state in June 2006.
For the foregoing reasons, the petition for review is DENIED. The pending motion for a stay of removal in this petition is DENIED as moot.
. See The World Factbook, Montenegro, at https://www.cia.gov/ cia/publications/ fact-book/geos/mj. html (last updated Jul. 20, 2006).