Opinions of the United 2007 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 2-15-2007 USA v. Grier Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential Docket No. 05-1698 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2007 Recommended Citation "USA v. Grier" (2007). 2007 Decisions. Paper 1544. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2007/1544 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2007 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu. PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 05-1698 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SEAN MICHAEL GRIER, Appellant On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania (D.C. No. 03-cr-00284) District Judge: Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo Argued En Banc September 13, 2006 * Before: SCIRICA, Chief Judge, SLOVITER, McKEE, RENDELL, BARRY, AMBRO, FUENTES, SMITH, FISHER, CHAGARES and VAN ANTWERPEN,** Circuit Judges. (Opinion filed February 5, 2007) * This case was originally argued on October 25, 2005, before Judges Sloviter, Fisher, and Rosenn. The coram was reconstituted to include Chief Judge Scirica after the death of Judge Rosenn. On June 6, 2006, an opinion by a majority of the original panel was filed, affirming the District Court’s legal conclusions, but remanding for resentencing, directing the District Court to state more fully its reasons for imposing the particular sentence. Judge Sloviter filed a dissenting opinion on the same day. Appellant petitioned for rehearing en banc. The Court granted the petition and vacated the panel’s judgment and opinion. ** Following argument, Judge Van Antwerpen took senior status on October 23, 2006, but continues to take part in this matter pursuant to Internal Operating Procedure 9.6.4. ORDER AMENDING PUBLISHED OPINION AMBRO, Circuit Judge It is now ordered that the published Opinion in the above case filed February 5, 2007, be amended as follows: In Judge Ambro’s opinion concurring in judgment, page 40, the second sentence in the only full paragraph on the page, replace the words “by way” with the words “through use”, so that the phrase reads “through use of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines”. By the Court, /s/ Thomas L. Ambro, Circuit Judge Dated: February 15, 2007 2