United States v. Jamar Blackshear

NOT PRECEDENTIAL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
_____________
No. 12-1485
_____________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
JAMAR BLACKSHEAR,
Appellant
________________________
On Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
District Court No. 2-11-cr-00227-001
District Judge: The Honorable R. Barclay Surrick
________________________
Argued March 21, 2013
Before: McKEE, Chief Judge, SMITH, and GREENAWAY, JR., Circuit Judges
(Filed: August 12, 2013)
Andrew J. Schell [ARGUED]
Office of United States Attorney
615 Chestnut Street
Suite 1250
Philadelphia, PA 19106
Counsel for Appellee
Mark E. Cedrone [ARGUED]
123 South Broad Street
Suite 810
Philadelphia, PA 19109
Counsel for Appellant
________________
OPINION
________________
SMITH, Circuit Judge.
Jamar Blackshear and his codefendant, Terrell Davis, appeal the denial of
their suppression motion. Blackshear has standing to challenge the search of the
rental vehicle under United States v. Baker, 221 F.3d 438, 442–43 (3d Cir. 2000).
For the reasons stated in Parts I and II of the companion case, United States v.
Davis, No. 12-1486 (3d Cir. Aug. 9, 2013), we will affirm the District Court’s
judgment.
2