DocketNumber: 02-2149
Filed Date: 4/4/2003
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 4/18/2021
Opinions of the United 2003 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 4-4-2003 USA v. Sheard Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket 02-2149 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2003 Recommended Citation "USA v. Sheard" (2003). 2003 Decisions. Paper 666. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2003/666 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2003 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu. NOT PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No: 02-2149 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BRYANT SHEARD, Appellant On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania D.C. Criminal No. 01-cr-00338-1 District Judge: Honorable Edmund V. Ludwig Submitted pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) March 31, 2003 Before: McKee, Smith & Cowen, Circuit Judges (Filed April 4, 2003) OPINION OF THE COURT McKee, Circuit Judge. Bryant Sheard appeals from the judgment of sentence that was entered following the district court’s acceptance of Sheard’s guilty plea pursuant to a written plea agreement. Defense counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,386 U.S. 738
(1967) in which counsel avers that, “after a conscientious examination of the record, [he] could find no non-frivolous issues for appeal.” Appellant’s Br. at 17. Accordingly, we will affirm the judgment of sentence. TO THE CLERK: Please file the foregoing not precedential opinion . By the Court /s/ Theodore A. McKee Circuit Judge 2 3