DocketNumber: 11-2210
Citation Numbers: 477 F. App'x 880
Judges: McKee, Aldisert, Weis
Filed Date: 7/10/2012
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 11/6/2024
HLD-175 NOT PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ___________ No. 11-2210 ___________ IN RE: JAY L. THOMAS, Petitioner ____________________________________ On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey (Related to D.N.J. Civ. No. 09-cv-3894) ____________________________________ Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P. June 30, 2011 Before: McKEE, Chief Judge, and ALDISERT and WEIS, Circuit Judges (Opinion filed: July 10, 2012) _________ OPINION _________ PER CURIAM Jay L. Thomas seeks a writ of mandamus, pursuant to28 U.S.C. § 1651
, directing the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey to adjudicate his underlying civil action against the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”). Subsequent to the filing of this mandamus petition, however, the District Court granted the Commissioner’s motion to dismiss Thomas’s complaint and ordered the Clerk of that Court to close the case. Accordingly, Thomas’s mandamus petition will be denied as moot. See Blanciak v. Allegheny Ludlum Corp.,77 F.3d 690
, 698-99 (3d Cir. 1996) (“If developments occur during the course of adjudication that . . . prevent a court from being able to grant the requested relief, the case must be dismissed as moot.”). 2