Joseph Aruanno v.

HLD-007 NOT PRECEDENTIAL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
___________
No. 20-1660
___________
IN RE: JOSEPH ARUANNO,
Petitioner
____________________________________
On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the
United States District Court for the District of New Jersey
(Related to D.N.J. Civ. No. 2-15-cv-07982)
____________________________________
Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P.
May 21, 2020
Before: SMITH, Chief Judge, CHAGARES and GREENBERG, Circuit Judges
(Opinion filed: June 10, 2020)
_________
OPINION*
_________
PER CURIAM
Joseph Aruanno petitions for a writ of mandamus directing the District Court to
rule on his Third Amended Complaint. After Aruanno filed this petition, the District
Court dismissed that complaint by order entered June 2, 2020. Thus, because Aruanno
has received all the relief he requested, his petition is moot and we will dismiss it on that
basis. See Blanciak v. Allegheny Ludlum Corp., 77 F.3d 690, 698-99 (3d Cir. 1996).
*
This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not
constitute binding precedent.