Zemirah El v.

HLD-003 NOT PRECEDENTIAL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
___________
No. 23-2960
___________
IN RE: ZEMIRAH MELODY CAROL RUTH EL, Trustee
Petitioner
____________________________________
On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
(Related to E.D. Pa. Civ. No. 2:22-cv-04062)
____________________________________
Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P.
December 7, 2023
Before: CHAGARES, Chief Judge, SHWARTZ, and RESTREPO, Circuit Judges
(Opinion filed April 8, 2024)
_________
OPINION*
_________
PER CURIAM
On November 6, 2023, Petitioner Zemirah El filed a pro se petition for a writ of
mandamus asking this Court to order the District Court to act on her second request for
default judgment against Respondent. We will deny the Petition.
By order entered January 11, 2023, the District Court denied Petitioner’s first
motion for default judgment and referred the request to the Clerk of Court for the Eastern
*
This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not constitute binding
precedent.
1
District of Pennsylvania. Respondent appeared and filed a motion to dismiss Petitioner’s
complaint on January 18, 2023. Thereafter, Petitioner filed a second motion for default
judgment on January 27, 2023, that Respondent filed a response in opposition to on
March 23, 2023. Petitioner subsequently filed documents in support of the second motion
for default judgment, including requests to expedite a ruling on the same. On December
14, 2023, the District Court granted Respondent’s motion to dismiss Petitioner’s
complaint and denied Petitioner’s second motion for default judgment.
As Petitioner’s mandamus petition no longer presents a live controversy, we will
dismiss it as moot. See Blanciak v. Allegheny Ludlum Corp., 77 F.3d 690, 698-99 (3d
Cir. 1996) (“If developments occur during the course of adjudication that . . . prevent a
court from being able to grant the requested relief, the case must be dismissed as moot.”).
2