United States v. Cromer

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-7128
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
EZEL CROMER, a/k/a Man Cromer,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Anderson. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District
Judge. (CR-96-768, CA-98-1430-8-13)
Submitted: October 8, 1998 Decided: Octcober 28, 1998
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ezel Cromer, Appellant Pro Se. Beth Drake, Assistant United States
Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying
his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).
The district court found that this was a second or successive
motion for which Appellant had failed to receive permission from
this Court to file. We have reviewed the record and the district
court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny
a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the rea-
soning of the district court. United States v. Cromer, Nos. CR-96-
768; CA-98-1430-8-13 (D.S.C. July 21, 1998). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2