Turner v. Hudson

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-6575
EDWIN CECIL TURNER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
SHERIFF HUDSON; LIEUTENANT BROOKS; DOCTOR
BERDEEN; ROBERT FRONK, Medic; DELIAH BROWLEY,
Medic,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
MAYOR BOWERS; GEORGE M. MCMILLAN; ONZLEE WARE,
Esquire; CONRAD DAUM, Dr.,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.
(CA-94-285-R)
Submitted: October 8, 1998 Decided: October 26, 1998
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Edwin Cecil Turner, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Kay Dillon, Kevin
Scott Blair, WOODS, ROGERS & HAZLEGROVE, Roanoke, Virginia, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court’s order granting Appel-
lees’ motion for summary judgment, thereby denying relief on his 42
U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint and denying relief on his state law
claims of medical malpractice and negligence. We have reviewed the
record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court and deny Appellant’s motion for appointment of counsel and
motion for sanctions. Turner v. Hudson, No. CA-94-285-R (W.D. Va.
Mar. 20, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2