Staffioney Campbell v. Lindsey-Campbell Oil Gas

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-2336
STAFFIONEY CAMPBELL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
LINDSEY-CAMPBELL OIL GAS SERVICES; MINUTEMAN FOOD MART 7
SEVEN GROCERY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Wilmington. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (7:20-cv-00181-BO)
Submitted: May 25, 2021 Decided: May 27, 2021
Before DIAZ and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Staffioney Campbell, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Staffioney Campbell appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate
judge’s recommendation to dismiss her civil complaint. The magistrate judge
recommended dismissing the action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and advised
Campbell that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive
appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. Despite this
warning, Campbell failed to object to the magistrate judge’s recommendation.
The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is
necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the
parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Wright v. Collins, 766
F.2d 841, 845–46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Campbell
has waived appellate review by failing to file objections. Accordingly, we affirm the
district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2