Destined George v. Michalek

USCA4 Appeal: 22-7356 Doc: 17 Filed: 04/28/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-7356
DESTINED C. GEORGE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
LT. MICHALEK; SGT. MOURING; CPT. LORD,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. M. Hannah Lauck, District Judge. (3:19-cv-00155-MHL-MRC)
Submitted: April 25, 2023 Decided: April 28, 2023
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, THACKER, Circuit Judge, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Destined C. M. D. George, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 22-7356 Doc: 17 Filed: 04/28/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Destined George, a Virginia inmate, filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against four
correctional officers, including Defendant John Doe. The district court dismissed John
Doe pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m), concluding that George failed to establish good cause
for failure to timely serve him. As to the remaining Defendants, the district court ultimately
accepted the magistrate judge’s recommendations, dismissed George’s claims for failure
to exhaust his administrative remedies, and denied reconsideration.
Confining our review to the issues raised in the informal brief, see 4th Cir. R. 34(b);
Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important
document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that
brief.”), we have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny
George’s motion for a transcript at government expense, and we affirm the district court’s
judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2