United States v. Keeling

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7634
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
HARRY T. KEELING, JR.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.
(CR-93-62-R, CA-96-622-R)
Submitted: March 13, 1997 Decided: March 19, 1997
Before HALL, ERVIN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Harry T. Keeling, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Julie C. Dudley, Assis-
tant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order granting in
part and denying in part his motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994),
amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996,
Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record
and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss on
the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Keeling, Nos.
CR-93-62-R; CA-96-622-R (W.D. Va. Oct. 11, 1996). We deny Appel-
lant's motion requesting transcripts at government expense because
the appeal does not present a substantial question. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2