Van Lilly v. Schwartz

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-6761
THURMAN VAN LILLY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MICHAEL SCHWARTZ, Chief; KENNETH OWENS,
Captain; FAY BARRINAUE, Lieutenant,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
LAMONT LEE GREENE; VERNON HUGE; ISAAC PRIEST;
ALLEN BELL, JR.; MICHAEL ROBINSON; MELVIN
GREEN; JOE WALKER,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief
District Judge. (CA-03-2526-2-17AJ)
Submitted: September 29, 2005 Decided: October 7, 2005
Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thurman Van Lilly, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Michael Smith, MCNAIR
LAW FIRM, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina; William Walter Doar, Jr.,
MCNAIR LAW FIRM, P.A., Georgetown, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Thurman Van Lilly appeals the district court’s order
accepting the report of the magistrate judge and denying relief on
his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. See Lilly v. Schwartz, No.
CA-03-2526-2-17AJ (D.S.C. Mar. 30, 2005). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -