Brillhart v. Ragland

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-7053
RICHARD EDWARD BRILLHART,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
VINCENT RAGLAND; TIM AMICO; PATRICIA
STANSBERRY; JENNIFER JONES,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior
District Judge. (5:07-ct-03073-H)
Submitted: January 24, 2008 Decided: February 11, 2008
Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Richard Edward Brillhart, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Richard Edward Brillhart appeals the district court’s
order dismissing under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000) his
complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of
Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. See Brillhart v.
Ragland, No. 5:07-ct-03073-H (E.D.N.C. July 9, 2007). We deny all
pending motions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -