Green v. State of South Carolina

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6627
NATHANIEL HAROLD GREEN,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; COUNTY OF BERKELEY; FAMILY COURT;
PAUL LABARRON; SANDY HOLLAND; JACK A. LANDIS; WAYNE M.
CREECH; JOHN DOE; JANE DOE,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge.
(6:10-cv-00396-TLW)
Submitted: August 19, 2010 Decided: August 30, 2010
Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Nathaniel Harold Green, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Nathaniel Harold Green appeals the district court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. See Green v. South Carolina, No. 6:10-
cv-00396-TLW (D.S.C. Mar. 30, 2010). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2